Mass-Assignment-Schutz: Nested-Vertragsdetails (Pentest R162-01)

createContract/updateContract spreadeten energyDetails/tvDetails/
carInsuranceDetails/mobileDetails (via ...mobileData) roh an Prisma.
Injizierte id/contractId konnten ein Detail-Objekt auf einen Fremdvertrag
reparenten oder den PK frei setzen (stilles 200 statt 400) - MEDIUM
(Integritaet; kein Cross-Tenant, staff-only, Portal 403).

Fix: Feld-Whitelists (pickEnergyScalars/pickMobileScalars/pickTvScalars/
pickCarInsuranceScalars, analog R158) an allen Spread-Stellen in create+update.
internet war bereits explizit (preparedInternetData) - safe. Whitelists
programmatisch gegen die DB-Spalten abgeglichen (minus id/contractId/
verschluesselt) - alle Diffs leer.

Verifiziert: energyDetails{basePrice:99.99, id:999999, contractId:fremd}
-> basePrice aktualisiert, ecd.id + contractId unveraendert (kein Reparenting).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

backend/src/services/contract.service.ts

@@ -378,6 +378,37 @@ function pickContractScalars(data: unknown): Record<string, unknown> {
   return out;
 }
 
+// Feld-Whitelists für die Nested-Detail-Modelle (Mass-Assignment-Schutz, Pentest
+// R162-01). Autoritativ aus den DB-Spalten, jeweils OHNE id/contractId (PK/FK
+// nie client-setzbar) und ohne Nested-Relationen (phoneNumbers/simCards/
+// contractMeters) bzw. verschlüsselte Felder (internetPasswordEncrypted), die
+// separat behandelt werden. Verhindert Reparenting/Orphaning per injizierter
+// id/contractId im energy/mobile/tv/carInsurance-Objekt.
+function makePick(fields: readonly string[]) {
+  return (data: unknown): Record<string, unknown> => {
+    const src = (data && typeof data === 'object') ? (data as Record<string, unknown>) : {};
+    const out: Record<string, unknown> = {};
+    for (const key of fields) if (key in src) out[key] = src[key];
+    return out;
+  };
+}
+
+const pickEnergyScalars = makePick([
+  'meterId', 'annualConsumption', 'basePrice', 'unitPrice', 'previousProviderName',
+  'previousCustomerNumber', 'annualConsumptionKwh', 'maloId', 'unitPriceNt',
+  'instantBonus', 'newCustomerBonus', 'noBonusDesired',
+]);
+const pickMobileScalars = makePick([
+  'phoneNumber', 'simCardNumber', 'dataVolume', 'includedMinutes', 'includedSMS',
+  'deviceModel', 'deviceImei', 'requiresMultisim', 'mobileNetwork',
+]);
+const pickTvScalars = makePick(['receiverModel', 'smartcardNumber', 'package']);
+const pickCarInsuranceScalars = makePick([
+  'licensePlate', 'hsn', 'tsn', 'vin', 'vehicleType', 'firstRegistration',
+  'noClaimsClass', 'insuranceType', 'deductiblePartial', 'deductibleFull',
+  'policyNumber', 'previousInsurer',
+]);
+
 export async function createContract(data: ContractCreateData) {
   const {
     energyDetails,
@@ -400,7 +431,7 @@ export async function createContract(data: ContractCreateData) {
       contractNumber: generateContractNumber(data.type),
       portalPasswordEncrypted,
       ...(energyDetails && ['ELECTRICITY', 'GAS'].includes(data.type)
-        ? { energyDetails: { create: energyDetails } }
+        ? { energyDetails: { create: pickEnergyScalars(energyDetails) as any } }
         : {}),
       ...(internetDetails && ['DSL', 'CABLE', 'FIBER'].includes(data.type)
         ? {
@@ -470,10 +501,10 @@ export async function createContract(data: ContractCreateData) {
           }
         : {}),
       ...(tvDetails && data.type === 'TV'
-        ? { tvDetails: { create: tvDetails } }
+        ? { tvDetails: { create: pickTvScalars(tvDetails) as any } }
         : {}),
       ...(carInsuranceDetails && data.type === 'CAR_INSURANCE'
-        ? { carInsuranceDetails: { create: carInsuranceDetails } }
+        ? { carInsuranceDetails: { create: pickCarInsuranceScalars(carInsuranceDetails) as any } }
         : {}),
     },
     include: {
@@ -553,8 +584,8 @@ export async function updateContract(
 
     await prisma.energyContractDetails.upsert({
       where: { contractId: id },
-      update: energyDetails,
+      update: pickEnergyScalars(energyDetails) as any,
-      create: { contractId: id, ...energyDetails },
+      create: { contractId: id, ...(pickEnergyScalars(energyDetails) as any) },
     });
 
     // ContractMeter synchronisieren wenn sich der Zähler ändert
@@ -679,11 +710,12 @@ export async function updateContract(
   }
 
   if (mobileDetails) {
-    const { simCards, ...mobileData } = mobileDetails;
+    const { simCards } = mobileDetails;
-    // Whitelist auf das Netz anwenden, bevor mobileData per Spread an
+    // Feld-Whitelist (Pentest R162-01): nur Scalars an Prisma – kein injiziertes
-    // Prisma geht (Update-Pfad reicht sonst beliebige Strings durch).
+    // id/contractId. Danach Netz normalisieren.
+    const mobileData: Record<string, unknown> = pickMobileScalars(mobileDetails);
     if ('mobileNetwork' in mobileData) {
-      mobileData.mobileNetwork = normalizeMobileNetwork(mobileData.mobileNetwork);
+      mobileData.mobileNetwork = normalizeMobileNetwork(mobileData.mobileNetwork as string | null | undefined);
     }
     const existing = await prisma.mobileContractDetails.findUnique({
       where: { contractId: id },
@@ -692,7 +724,7 @@ export async function updateContract(
     if (existing) {
       await prisma.mobileContractDetails.update({
         where: { contractId: id },
-        data: mobileData,
+        data: mobileData as any,
       });
 
       if (simCards) {
@@ -730,7 +762,7 @@ export async function updateContract(
       await prisma.mobileContractDetails.create({
         data: {
           contractId: id,
-          ...mobileData,
+          ...(mobileData as any),
           simCards: simCards
             ? {
                 create: simCards.map((sc) => ({
@@ -753,16 +785,16 @@ export async function updateContract(
   if (tvDetails) {
     await prisma.tvContractDetails.upsert({
       where: { contractId: id },
-      update: tvDetails,
+      update: pickTvScalars(tvDetails) as any,
-      create: { contractId: id, ...tvDetails },
+      create: { contractId: id, ...(pickTvScalars(tvDetails) as any) },
     });
   }
 
   if (carInsuranceDetails) {
     await prisma.carInsuranceDetails.upsert({
       where: { contractId: id },
-      update: carInsuranceDetails,
+      update: pickCarInsuranceScalars(carInsuranceDetails) as any,
-      create: { contractId: id, ...carInsuranceDetails },
+      create: { contractId: id, ...(pickCarInsuranceScalars(carInsuranceDetails) as any) },
     });
   }
 

docs/todo.md

@@ -97,6 +97,19 @@ isolierte Instanz (keine Multi-Tenancy im Code), Provisioning + Abrechnung
 
 ## ✅ Erledigt
 
+- [x] **🔒 Mass-Assignment-Schutz: Nested-Vertragsdetails (Pentest R162-01)** (2026-08-18)
+  - `createContract`/`updateContract` spreadeten `energyDetails`/`tvDetails`/
+    `carInsuranceDetails`/`mobileDetails` (via `...mobileData`) roh an Prisma →
+    injizierte `id`/`contractId` konnten ein Detail-Objekt **reparenten** (auf
+    Fremdvertrag umhängen) oder den **PK frei setzen** (stilles 200 statt 400).
+    MEDIUM (Integrität; kein Cross-Tenant, staff-only, Portal 403).
+  - **Fix:** Feld-Whitelists (`pickEnergyScalars`/`pickMobileScalars`/`pickTvScalars`/
+    `pickCarInsuranceScalars`, analog R158) an allen Spread-Stellen. `internet`
+    war bereits explizit (safe). Whitelists programmatisch gegen die DB-Spalten
+    abgeglichen (minus id/contractId/verschlüsselt) – alle Diffs leer.
+  - Verifiziert: `energyDetails:{basePrice:99.99, id:999999, contractId:fremd}` →
+    basePrice aktualisiert, ecd.id + contractId **unverändert** (kein Reparenting).
+
 - [x] **📋 Aufgaben ohne Kunde/Vertrag anlegbar** (2026-08-18)
   - `ContractTask.contractId` nullable (Migration `20260818110000`). Neuer Endpoint
     `POST /tasks` (staff-only, `contracts:update`) für allgemeine Aufgaben ohne